War Capitalism and The New Emergency

It is because of the nature of the circumstances, because of the impossibility of foreseeing future developments, because of the need for giving the Government power to act quickly in relation to these developments, that this section has been drawn in this wide manner.

Seán F. Lemass TD, Emergency Powers Bill debate (Dáil Éireann, 2-9-1939)

It is no exaggeration to say that we now face one of the darkest hours in the history of our independent state. To deal with this unprecedented national economic emergency, our country needs an unprecedented level of political resolve. What is needed now after a long period of reckless, ill disciplined Government is strong, resolute leadership.

“Statement of Common Purpose”, Fine Gael/Labour coalition (7-3-2011)

With the dreary predictability of a thirties adventure serial, those components of the National Austerity Front whom circumstance has spared opprobrium have finally torn away their masks to reveal what we knew all along; that they are one and the same.

The tenor of the Programme For Government’s preamble skirts dangerously close to the argot of national-salvation fascism, a fact which might cause greater alarm had such language not been systematically normalised and legitimised by our national media and political establishment over the past three years.

Most disturbing of all is the reappearance of the “democratic revolution” motif, which became an ex post facto slogan of the Fine Gael campaign only after the election itself. The constant stressing of the government’s supposedly cast-iron mandate should put the fear of God in the poor and the vulnerable.

Beyond the rhetorical indicators, there are a few conclusions we can draw:

1: The government is likely to see out its full term.
2: The anti-public sector rhetoric may be toned down, but the offensive will gather momentum with the connivance of a trade union leadership which now has no incentive whatever to stand up and fight.
3: Revisions to the Memorandum of Understanding will at least double the job cull in the public sector within two years. Moreover, the government is aware of this, hence the apparent compromise around Labour’s lower figure.
4: The commitment to preserving the basic rate of social welfare will be finessed by fragmenting Jobseekers Benefit/Allowance into a wide variety of different means-tested and contingent payments, coupled with unprecedented harassment of the unemployed (an explicit manifesto pledge of both parties.) Note that the Programme For Government includes no reference to the previous administration’s scandalous cuts in payment to young adults.

Some of the proposals for local government reform are reasonably encouraging in principle; however, the coalition has nothing to lose on this front, given its joint or overall control of so many local authorities. Despite the superficial steps towards democratisation, collusion between central government, council bureaucracy and local representatives is likely to be even more pronounced under the new dispensation.

For a broader analysis, see WorldByStorm’s exegesis on Cedar Lounge.


3 Responses to “War Capitalism and The New Emergency”

  1. Mark P Says:

    Any time you hear some fool talking about how the left need to work with the Labour left and how the left needs to tone down attacks on Labour so as to avoid alienating the Labour rank and file, they should be reminded of this conference and what it reveals.

    A maximum of 50 Labour members opposed a sweeping programme of job cuts, water taxes and privatisations, the most right wing programme for government in the history of the state. And that includes people who aren’t left wing but are simply shrewd enough to realise that coalition isn’t in their party interests at the moment. There is no healthy rank and file there to appeal to. It is a figment of the imagination.

    • DublinDilettante Says:

      I agree entirely, but I think some people have a fairly legitimate concern about alienating left Labour voters rather than party members. I can’t say it troubles me much, admittedly.

  2. Mark P Says:

    That’s a slightly different issue.

    Many people who voted for Labour are part of the potential audience for the socialist left. Very, very, few people who are Labour activists are part of our potential audience.

    There are many issues or campaigns where people will be talking about working with Labour members, not alienating Labour members, etc. For instance, it can be guaranteed that some parts of the left will start arguing that line when moves are made to establish a union activist network. It’s a complete nonsense, based on transposing an already faulty analysis of the situation in other countries to Ireland without actually bothering to check if there are Labour rank and file activists to appeal to here at all.

    This is distinct from the issue of reaching Labour voters, something which I do think is important. But also something which I think is best achieved through hard, relentless, uncomromising criticism. We will not convince Labour voters to stop voting Labour by telling them that Labour is basically good, basically part of the left or basically our ally.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: